Evaluating and Mitigating Anti-LGBTQ Biases in German and Multilingual Language Models

Melina Morch, Daniel Braun
8/31/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: Responsible-NLP/Anti-LGBTQ-Biases-in-MLLM (1 star, last commit 2026-09-01).

Abstract

While gender and racial biases in language models have been widely studied, anti-LGBTQ biases remain underexplored, particularly beyond English. Existing benchmarks often do not capture cultural and linguistic variation and rely on gender representations. This paper introduces a multilingual German-English benchmark dataset for the evaluation of anti-LGBTQ biases in language models. It combines community-sourced stereotypes from German-speaking queer individuals with a German translation of WinoQueer. The data is used to evaluate eight language models across sizes and architectures and explore mitigation through fine-tuning on community and progressive media content. Results show that language models reproduce anti-queer stereotypes, with variation across identities and models. Differences between the translated and community-based data highlight the importance of cultural adaptation for multilingual bias evaluation. Fine-tuning reduces bias on average, but not consistently across models and identities. Warning: This text contains examples of anti-queer hateful language and stereotypes.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Evaluating and Mitigating Anti-LGBTQ Biases in German and Multilingual Language Models

10Aug 26, 20261 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{morch2026evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating and Mitigating Anti-LGBTQ Biases in German and Multilingual Language Models},
  author = {Melina Morch and Daniel Braun},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2608.30884},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30884v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2608.30884.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2608.30884)

Discussion