NSIDDx: A Design Framework for Neuro-Symbolic, Practitioner-First Differential Diagnosis in Low-Resource Settings

Aarav Singh
8/31/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

LLM-based diagnostic systems achieve high semantic accuracy on benchmarks, but open-ended evaluation on clinically uncommon presentations reveals a systematic gap between headline accuracy and verifiable clinical reliability. We evaluate an LLM+rare-disease-RAG pipeline across two cohorts and show that the paradigm produces confident outputs that are frequently unverifiable and systematically resistant to clinician interrogation. We present NSIDDx (Neuro-Symbolic Integrated Differential Diagnosis System), a design framework arguing that DDx systems in low-resource settings must treat the clinician as an active reasoning agent. We instantiate this through a neuro-symbolic pipeline with ternary symptom encoding, contradiction detection, audit strings, and practitioner override - running offline on consumer hardware. We distill five design principles for clinician-in-the-loop clinical NLP and invite the prospective studies needed to validate the claim at scale.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{singh2026nsiddx,
  title  = {NSIDDx: A Design Framework for Neuro-Symbolic, Practitioner-First Differential Diagnosis in Low-Resource Settings},
  author = {Aarav Singh},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.00256},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00256v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.00256.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.00256)

Discussion