LightMedSeg-ISLES: Stroke Lesion Segmentation with 81x Fewer Parameters than nnU-Net

Giorgi Nikvashvili, Hanxue Gu, Jie Bao, Kang Wang, Yang Yang
9/9/2026
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Large networks and ensembles often lead medical image segmentation challenges, but their storage and inference demands complicate deployment. We present LightMedSeg-ISLES, a 1.26-million-parameter pipeline for T1-weighted stroke lesion segmentation in ISLES'26. On a 146-case held-out cohort, flip test-time augmentation produces 0.618 mean Dice and 0.599 lesion-wise F1. A 102.35-million-parameter nnU-Net ResEnc-L produces 0.634 Dice and 0.544 lesion-wise F1 after size filtering. LightMedSeg therefore retains 97.5\% of nnU-Net's Dice with 81.4$\times$ fewer parameters while improving lesion-wise F1 by 0.055. Its four-pass TTA operating point requires 4.7$\times$ fewer FLOPs per standardized patch than nnU-Net. It also slightly exceeds filtered UNETR++ and nnFormer. Longer training and stronger augmentation add 0.0358 Dice without increasing capacity, establishing a strong single-checkpoint alternative to much larger models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nikvashvili2026lightmedsegisles,
  title  = {LightMedSeg-ISLES: Stroke Lesion Segmentation with 81x Fewer Parameters than nnU-Net},
  author = {Giorgi Nikvashvili and Hanxue Gu and Jie Bao and Kang Wang and Yang Yang},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.09634},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09634v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.09634.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.09634)

Discussion