LiteRAG: Cost-Efficient Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Daniel Alejandro Coll Tejeda, Pedro García López, Daniel Barcelona-Pons
9/9/2026
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Graph-based retrieval can improve multi-hop question answering, but existing approaches often incur high query-time costs and produce diffuse, oversized contexts that reduce generation efficiency. We present LiteRAG, a graph-based retrieval method that replaces expensive retrieval-time LLM control with query-conditioned algorithmic exploration and reasoning-chain context construction. On DistComp, a benchmark for multi-hop retrieval over distributed-systems papers, LiteRAG attains the highest overall quality among the evaluated methods (0.798) while reducing per-query latency by over 100$\times$ and cost by over 99% relative to GraphRAG Global and DRIFT. On UltraDomain, it matches LinearRAG on overall quality while using about 14$\times$ fewer tokens. An ablation study indicates that LiteRAG's query-adaptive thresholding and community-aware hub penalization are the main drivers of its token-efficiency gains.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tejeda2026literag,
  title  = {LiteRAG: Cost-Efficient Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation},
  author = {Daniel Alejandro Coll Tejeda and Pedro García López and Daniel Barcelona-Pons},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.10239},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10239v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.10239.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.10239)

Discussion