A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection

Wagner Moreno Schmitz, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Thiago Magalhães Amaral, Dalcimar Casanova, Jefferson Tales Oliva
9/10/2026
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Early diagnosis of melanoma is critical for improving patient survival rates. However, accurately distinguishing melanoma from other skin lesions remains a significant clinical challenge due to the high visual similarity among lesion types and variability in image acquisition conditions. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, has emerged as a promising tool to support dermatological diagnosis by automating feature extraction from medical images. Among the available approaches, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong performance in image classification tasks, making them well-suited for analyzing both dermatoscopic and histopathological images, given their ability to capture hierarchical visual patterns relevant to lesion characterization. Nevertheless, despite numerous pre-trained CNN architectures having been proposed, selecting the most appropriate one for a given imaging modality remains an open challenge. In this study, we evaluate pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for skin lesion classification using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Experiments were conducted on the HAM10000, ISIC 2018, and CR-AI4SkIN datasets, evaluating the ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3 architectures under the same training protocol. The experimental evaluation showed that the models achieved accuracies ranging from 71% (InceptionV3 on ISIC 2018) to 84% (ResNet50 on HAM10000) on dermatoscopic images. For histopathological images, accuracies ranged from 72% (VGG19) to 83% (ResNet50) on the CR-AI4SkIN dataset. The results demonstrate that model performance differs between dermatoscopic and histopathological image modalities, showing that architectures exhibiting similar performance on dermatoscopic images exhibit different performance on histopathological data.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{schmitz2026comparative,
  title  = {A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection},
  author = {Wagner Moreno Schmitz and Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa and Thiago Magalhães Amaral and Dalcimar Casanova and Jefferson Tales Oliva},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.11550},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11550v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.11550.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.11550)

Discussion