Recurrent GraphNeural NetworkswithSet-BasedAggregation

Blai Bonet
9/14/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recurrent GNNs iterate message passing to convergence, and their logical characterizations to date rely on multi-set aggregation, graded (counting) logics, and halting or acceptance conditions that cannot be verified from the network's parameters. We study recurrent GNNs with set-based aggregation and identify sufficient conditions checkable from the weights for networks to compile into formulas and formulas into networks. The main result is an effective, two-directional equivalence between a class of networks and the Boolean closure of reachability and safety properties, the fragment B$Σ^{\circ}_1$ of the modal $μ$-calculus. The fragment is not an artifact: it is the exact expressive level of stabilization over finite vocabulary, which supports fixed points of a single polarity and Boolean combinations thereof, but not the composition of fixed points of opposite polarities. The correspondence needs no counting logic, no external halting signal, and no non-effective acceptance condition, yielding a verifiable path from weights to symbolic explanations for networks meeting the conditions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bonet2026recurrent,
  title  = {Recurrent GraphNeural NetworkswithSet-BasedAggregation},
  author = {Blai Bonet},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.15932},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15932v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.15932.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.15932)

Discussion