Complexities of Weak Proximal Oracle Methods for Composite Convex Optimization

Dan Garber
9/21/2026
math.OCcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We consider a standard convex composite optimization problem with either smooth or nonsmooth objective function, and under quadratic growth. In recent years, several works gave algorithms based on a \textit{weak proximal oracle} (WPO) that essentially match in oracle complexities proximal (sub)gradient methods relying on exact prox operations. Importantly, such WPOs, which relax the strong optimality condition of the standard prox operator, may admit much more efficient implementation in terms of runtime when optimal solutions have some sparse structure. A question remained if such WPO-based methods can be accelerated (in the sense of Nesterov's accelerated gradient). In this work we provide a negative answer by establishing lower bounds against both deterministic and randomized methods. Thus, while WPOs can substantially reduce the cost of individual oracle calls, this comes with an inherent loss in oracle complexity. We also provide a new upper-bound for WPO-based nonsmooth convex composite optimization, nearly matching the proximal subgradient method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{garber2026complexities,
  title  = {Complexities of Weak Proximal Oracle Methods for Composite Convex Optimization},
  author = {Dan Garber},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.24423},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24423v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.24423.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.24423)

Discussion