EAGER: Enhancing Generative Event Extraction via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

Omar Adjali, Siting Liang, Omair Shahzad Bhatti, Daniel Sonntag
9/24/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

End-to-end event extraction remains challenging for large language models as it requires simultaneous identification of event triggers, classification of event types, and extraction of schema-grounded argument spans. We present EAGER, a reinforcement learning framework for generative event extraction that combines fine-grained verifiable rewards with Schema-Contrastive Advantage Estimation to alleviate advantage collapse under sparse binary rewards. Our reward design explicitly targets structural validity, extraction accuracy, groundedness, coverage, over-generation, and span precision. Experiments across seven benchmark datasets show that EAGER consistently outperforms prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and prior reinforcement learning baselines, achieving a substantial improvement over the strongest prior method. Results demonstrate that task-aligned verifiable rewards and contrastive advantage estimation substantially improve structured extraction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{adjali2026eager,
  title  = {EAGER: Enhancing Generative Event Extraction via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards},
  author = {Omar Adjali and Siting Liang and Omair Shahzad Bhatti and Daniel Sonntag},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.29230},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29230v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.29230.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.29230)

Discussion