Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer Landmarks

Jayanta Mukherjee, Shourya Verma, Mengbo Wang, Jasorsi Ghosh, Ananth Grama
9/30/2026
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Representer explanations rank the training landmarks that most influence a self-supervised representation. At scale, this ranking rests on up to four stacked approximations of the empirical neural tangent kernel (eNTK). These are random output heads, a parameter sketch, landmark sampling and a coefficient fit. Existing analyses bound each approximation separately, but none certifies the top-$K$ set against their combined error. We introduce CAIRN (Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer laNdmarks), a framework that carries this error through to the ranking. We derive the exact variance of the sketched multi-head eNTK, which matches measurement within $4\%$ where Johnson-Lindenstrauss bounds err by up to $2.5\times$. This yields a high-probability top-$K$ certificate for a fixed coefficient fit, alongside exact residual-trace certificates for discarded spectral mass. An exact product-variance identity separates kernel error from fit variability and identifies when a larger kernel budget can still sharpen a ranking. Stochastic Lanczos Quadrature (SLQ) estimates the effective dimension within $0.72\%$ and guides the landmark budget without dense eigendecomposition. We show that residual mass does not control class coverage, and residual-greedy selection cuts the worst coverage excess of $k$-means++ from $8.5\times$ to $1.55\times$ ($4\times$ on the sketched eNTK). Cross-view initializers outperform principal-component initialization in five (AUI) to all six (CSI) settings. Against the KREPES Gauss-Newton solver, CAIRN converges $2.5$ to $11.3\times$ faster, trails by at most $0.31$ points and gains up to $3.14$ points on MNIST. Together, these results make the reliability of representer explanations measurable and show where approximation budgets are best spent.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mukherjee2026certified,
  title  = {Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer Landmarks},
  author = {Jayanta Mukherjee and Shourya Verma and Mengbo Wang and Jasorsi Ghosh and Ananth Grama},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.38901},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38901v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.38901.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.38901)

Discussion