Settle: Learning When to Stop Reasoning

Ryan Brown, Zihao Fu, Chris Russell
9/30/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reasoning models often continue generating after their answers have settled. Settle learns when to stop from answer stability in completed traces. It trains the existing end-of-reasoning token while keeping other predictions close to the base model, and requires only ordinary decoding at inference. On MATH-500 with Qwen3-4B, Settle reduces token count by 40% with a 0.5-percentage-point decrease in accuracy. It gains 6.16 percentage points over supervised fine-tuning on the same traces shortened at their first stable answer, at nearly identical token counts. Its stopping score predicts whether a correct answer will remain correct. Settle extends the accuracy-token-count Pareto frontier of the evaluated stopping methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{brown2026settle,
  title  = {Settle: Learning When to Stop Reasoning},
  author = {Ryan Brown and Zihao Fu and Chris Russell},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.38997},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38997v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.38997.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.38997)

Discussion