Reserve-Aware Contrast Certificates for Conservative Bandits with Uncertain Baselines

Qinchuan Cheng
9/30/2026
cs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Conservative bandits must improve an incumbent policy without exhausting a prescribed performance budget. When the incumbent is uncertain, separately bounding candidate and baseline rewards can charge twice for shared estimation error. We develop Reserve-C4B around the baseline-relative contrast itself. A shared confidence set yields an exact expression for this avoidable penalty and a tighter admissibility test at every fixed history. A reserve ledger separates statistical evidence from permitted performance deficit; a prefix-refresh extension recertifies accumulated decisions under the current confidence set without discarding previously certified credit. For linear rewards, self-normalized confidence sets provide simultaneous validity over time and adaptively generated candidates, and the resulting policy satisfies a conditional-mean performance constraint with high probability. Reproducible experiments isolate certificate coupling, prefix refresh, and historical information, showing large reductions in baseline fallback while exposing the limitations of frozen certificates.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cheng2026reserveaware,
  title  = {Reserve-Aware Contrast Certificates for Conservative Bandits with Uncertain Baselines},
  author = {Qinchuan Cheng},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.39106},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39106v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2609.39106.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2609.39106)

Discussion