Square-Root Regret for Adversarial Multiplayer Bandits without Collision Information or Shared Randomness

Chenyu Gan
10/5/2026
cs.LGcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study adversarial multiplayer bandits with $K$ arms and $2\le m<K$ labeled players, without collision information, shared randomness, or an external communication channel. We design a constructive communication and synchronization protocol with a Monte Carlo public constructor. With probability at least $1-CN^{-32}$ over preprocessing, where $N=2Km(T+1)$, its fixed published output satisfies \[ R_T\le C K^{5/2}\sqrt T\log^2(2Km(T+1)) \] simultaneously for every oblivious reward sequence chosen after preprocessing. Here $R_T$ is expected regret over the players' private execution randomness. Positive reward observations establish a common learning schedule and synchronize players before learning begins. The cost of delayed communication is charged to the support of positive rewards, ensuring that periods with little useful feedback incur only limited regret. A slow--fast learning procedure then maintains valid reward estimates while assignments and scores are exchanged.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gan2026squareroot,
  title  = {Square-Root Regret for Adversarial Multiplayer Bandits without Collision Information or Shared Randomness},
  author = {Chenyu Gan},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.05688},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05688v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.05688.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.05688)

Discussion