Do VLAs Really Follow Instructions? Diagnosing How-Level Instruction Following in Vision-Language-Action Models

Sangwu Park, Wonjoong Kim, Yeonjun In, Chanyoung Park
10/15/2026
cs.CVcs.RO

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) models are expected to follow instructions like their language backbones, yet prior work has focused on What-level instructions that specify the task rather than How-level instructions that specify how to carry it out. Through our diagnoses, we find that How-level instructions do not help current VLAs and lower task success. We hypothesize that pairing each training episode with a single instruction limits How-level instruction following, and show that training with segment-level enriched instructions makes actions respond to such instructions without consistently raising task success. To measure How-level instruction following beyond standard benchmarks, we introduce SIMPLER-IN, where success requires conditions given only in the instruction. It shows that the gained responsiveness does not extend to demanding or out-of-distribution How-level instructions. How-level instruction following thus remains an open challenge.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2026vlas,
  title  = {Do VLAs Really Follow Instructions? Diagnosing How-Level Instruction Following in Vision-Language-Action Models},
  author = {Sangwu Park and Wonjoong Kim and Yeonjun In and Chanyoung Park},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.21251},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21251v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.21251.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.21251)

Discussion