Regret Lower Bound for Online Learning of Quantum States with Logarithmic Loss, with Applications to Quantum State Tomography and Confidence Sequences for Matrix Means

Yen-Huan Li, Wei-Fu Tseng
10/15/2026
cs.LGmath.STquant-ph

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study the problem of online learning of quantum states with logarithmic loss, which is a quantum generalization of online portfolio selection and has applications to quantum state tomography, the task of estimating an unknown quantum state from measurement outcomes. We first establish a regret lower bound, showing that the regret rates of Exponential Weights and the algorithm of Tseng et al. (2025) have optimal polynomial dependence on the dimension. Our analysis leads to two further results. First, our lower-bound proof leads to a quantum state tomography algorithm that is sample optimal up to polylogarithmic factors in the sample size. Second, we develop an algorithm for constructing confidence sequences for the mean of a matrix-valued random variable. A numerical experiment shows that the latter algorithm is competitive with existing methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2026regret,
  title  = {Regret Lower Bound for Online Learning of Quantum States with Logarithmic Loss, with Applications to Quantum State Tomography and Confidence Sequences for Matrix Means},
  author = {Yen-Huan Li and Wei-Fu Tseng},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.21273},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21273v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.21273.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.21273)

Discussion