Beyond SAEs: Consistent Concept Discovery with Sparse Coding

Jinho Choi, Hyesu Lim, Jaegul Choo, Steffen Schneider
10/16/2026
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) explain foundation model representations by decomposing activations into sparse combinations of learned dictionary atoms. However, the learned dictionaries can vary across training runs, limiting the reliability and reproducibility of SAE-based analyses. We propose Consistent Sparse Dictionary Learning (ConSDL), which replaces the standard linear encoder with per-sample sparse coding. This is motivated by our synthetic analysis showing that coefficients from a single linear encoder pass are suboptimal compared with those obtained by per-sample optimization, suggesting that sparse coding is a reliable mechanism for dictionary learning. Across 16 synthetic settings, ConSDL achieves near-perfect dictionary and coefficient recovery. These gains translate to state-of-the-art cross-seed consistency across four vision and language settings, where ConSDL improves dictionary and coefficient consistency by 17.6% and 35.9%, respectively, over the average of six SAE baselines.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{choi2026beyond,
  title  = {Beyond SAEs: Consistent Concept Discovery with Sparse Coding},
  author = {Jinho Choi and Hyesu Lim and Jaegul Choo and Steffen Schneider},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.23801},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23801v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.23801.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.23801)

Discussion