Beyond Attack Success Rate: Cost-Aware Metric for Evaluating Iterative LLM Jailbreaks

Rohan Menon, Chih-Hong Cheng
10/19/2026
cs.CRcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Attack success rate (ASR) evaluates jailbreaks against large language models without accounting for repeated calls to the victim model. Yet each additional call gives the deployed system another opportunity to detect the attack and intervene. We introduce $\mathrm{ASR}_{\mathrm{STEP}}$, which penalizes additional victim-model calls while retaining binary success judgments. Our evaluation considers GCG~\cite{zou2023universal}, PAIR~\cite{chao2025jailbreaking} with a step budget, and a single-step PAP~\cite{zeng2024johnny} baseline on JailBreakBench across three model families. GCG's scores decrease by 7.0--8.7 percentage points after discounting, while PAP's remain unchanged. While for PAIR~\cite{chao2025jailbreaking}, we see a wider discounting range between 3.4-12 percentage points, showing that the "step" quantity differs per iterative strategy. Reporting both metrics makes the discount due to repeated victim-model interaction explicit. Code is available \hyperlink{https://github.com/SuELS-Group/beyond_asr}{here}.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{menon2026beyond,
  title  = {Beyond Attack Success Rate: Cost-Aware Metric for Evaluating Iterative LLM Jailbreaks},
  author = {Rohan Menon and Chih-Hong Cheng},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.26589},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26589v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.26589.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.26589)

Discussion