Pairwise Learning Increases Data Efficiency in Deep Neural Networks

Robert Bain, Marjan Rashidi, Elizabeth Chrastil
10/20/2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Deep neural networks often fail at small-sample regression, collapsing to low-variance predictions that miss individual differences. Here, we introduce a pairwise comparison framework that reframes regression as aggregated relative rankings. This method improves data efficiency across model architectures and dataset sizes. On the UTKFace dataset (23k images), pairwise learning generates over one billion training comparisons without additional supervision. The paired ranking allows a lightweight ResNet10 trained from scratch on home hardware to achieve a 3.64-year MAE-surpassing previous models, including those with large-scale pretraining. For classification into categories, pairwise supervision consistently outperforms an otherwise identical 10-way crossentropy model on STL10 with 500-2000 labeled examples, improving accuracy by up to 5.2%. Overall, pairwise supervision enhances data efficiency and enables strong regression and classification performance when labeled data are limited, particularly in clinical settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bain2026pairwise,
  title  = {Pairwise Learning Increases Data Efficiency in Deep Neural Networks},
  author = {Robert Bain and Marjan Rashidi and Elizabeth Chrastil},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.27669},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27669v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.27669.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.27669)

Discussion