Are Linguistic and Arithmetic Circuits Dissociated in LLMs?

Riku Kisako, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Ryohei Sasano
10/20/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit both knowledge of language, rendered by, for example, grammatical judgment ability, and abilities to perform tasks through language, such as math-word problem solving. Motivated by neurolinguistic studies of their neural dissociation in human brains, in this study, we investigate the overlap of their circuits in large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we examine the overlap and causal effects between the circuits extracted for linguistic and arithmetic tasks, using controlled materials and circuit discovery methods from the mechanistic interpretability field. Our experiments with five LLMs show that circuit similarity is mostly explained by task domains (linguistic vs. arithmetic), rather than by their input and output vocabularies or by the syntactic similarities between natural-language sentences and arithmetic expressions. This finding suggests that LLMs may process linguistic and arithmetic information using largely separate neural circuits, highlighting an ability-based modular organization of circuits within these models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kisako2026linguistic,
  title  = {Are Linguistic and Arithmetic Circuits Dissociated in LLMs?},
  author = {Riku Kisako and Tatsuki Kuribayashi and Ryohei Sasano},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.27790},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27790v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2610.27790.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2610.27790)

Discussion