Improved Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets

Fang-yuan Kong, Zilong Wang, Shuai Li
2/3/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

A rich line of works study the bandit learning problem in two-sided matching markets, where one side of market participants (players) are uncertain about their preferences and hope to find a stable matching during iterative matchings with the other side (arms). The state-of-the-art analysis shows that the player-optimal stable regret is of order O ( K log T/ ∆ 2 ) where K is the number of arms, T is the horizon and ∆ is the players’ minimum preference gap. However, this result may be far from the lower bound Ω(max { N log T/ ∆ 2 , K log T/ ∆ } ) since the number K of arms (workers, publisher slots) may be much larger than that N of players (employers in labor markets, advertisers in online advertising, respectively). In this paper, we propose a new algorithm and show that the regret can be upper bounded by O ( N 2 log T/ ∆ 2 + K log T/ ∆) . This result removes the dependence on K in the main order term and improves the state-of-the-art guarantee in common cases where N is much smaller than K . Such an advantage is also verified in experiments. In addition, we provide a refined analysis for the existing centralized UCB algorithm and show that, under α -condition, it achieves an improved O ( N log T/ ∆ 2 + K log T/ ∆) regret.

DOISemantic Scholar

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{kong2026improved,
  title  = {Improved Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets},
  author = {Fang-yuan Kong and Zilong Wang and Shuai Li},
  year   = {2026},
  doi    = {10.52202/079017-2916},
  url    = {https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-2916},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Discussion