Simpler Diffusion: 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 with pixel-space diffusion

Emiel Hoogeboom, Thomas Mensink, J. Heek, Kay Lamerigts, Ruiqi Gao +1 more
2/10/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Latent diffusion models have become the popular choice for scaling up diffusion models for high resolution image synthesis. Compared to pixel-space models that are trained end-to-end, latent models are perceived to be more efficient and to produce higher image quality at high resolution. Here we challenge these notions, and show that pixel-space models can be very competitive to latent models both in quality and efficiency, achieving 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 and new SOTA results on ImageNet128, ImageNet256 and Kinetics600.We present a simple recipe for scaling end-to-end pixel-space diffusion models to high resolutions. 1: Use the sigmoid loss-weighting [25] with our prescribed hyper-parameters. 2: Use our simplified memory-efficient architecture with fewer skip-connections. 3: Scale the model to favor processing the image at a high resolution with fewer parameters, rather than using more parameters at a lower resolution. Combining these with guidance intervals, we obtain a family of pixel-space diffusion models we call Simpler Diffusion (SiD2).

DOISemantic Scholar

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{hoogeboom2026simpler,
  title  = {Simpler Diffusion: 1.5 FID on ImageNet512 with pixel-space diffusion},
  author = {Emiel Hoogeboom and Thomas Mensink and J. Heek and Kay Lamerigts and Ruiqi Gao and Tim Salimans},
  year   = {2026},
  doi    = {10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.01683},
  url    = {https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.01683},
  journal = {CVPR 2025 2025}
}

Discussion