Understanding the Relation of User and News Representations in Content-Based Neural News Recommendation

Lucas Möller, Sebastian Padó
7/29/2022
cs.IRcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

A number of models for neural content-based news recommendation have been proposed. However, there is limited understanding of the relative importances of the three main components of such systems (news encoder, user encoder, and scoring function) and the trade-offs involved. In this paper, we assess the hypothesis that the most widely used means of matching user and candidate news representations is not expressive enough. We allow our system to model more complex relations between the two by assessing more expressive scoring functions. Across a wide range of baseline and established systems this results in consistent improvements of around 6 points in AUC. Our results also indicate a trade-off between the complexity of news encoder and scoring function: A fairly simple baseline model scores well above 68% AUC on the MIND dataset and comes within 2 points of the published state-of-the-art, while requiring a fraction of the computational costs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mller2022understanding,
  title  = {Understanding the Relation of User and News Representations in Content-Based Neural News Recommendation},
  author = {Lucas Möller and Sebastian Padó},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2207.14704},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14704v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2207.14704.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2207.14704)

Discussion