Bayesian Optimization with Informative Covariance

Afonso Eduardo, Michael U. Gutmann
8/4/2022
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Bayesian optimization is a methodology for global optimization of unknown and expensive objectives. It combines a surrogate Bayesian regression model with an acquisition function to decide where to evaluate the objective. Typical regression models are given by Gaussian processes with stationary covariance functions. However, these functions are unable to express prior input-dependent information, including possible locations of the optimum. The ubiquity of stationary models has led to the common practice of exploiting prior information via informative mean functions. In this paper, we highlight that these models can perform poorly, especially in high dimensions. We propose novel informative covariance functions for optimization, leveraging nonstationarity to encode preferences for certain regions of the search space and adaptively promote local exploration during optimization. We demonstrate that the proposed functions can increase the sample efficiency of Bayesian optimization in high dimensions, even under weak prior information.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{eduardo2022bayesian,
  title  = {Bayesian Optimization with Informative Covariance},
  author = {Afonso Eduardo and Michael U. Gutmann},
  year   = {2022},
  eprint = {2208.02704},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02704v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2208.02704.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2208.02704)

Discussion