Predicting Desirable Revisions of Evidence and Reasoning in Argumentative Writing

Tazin Afrin, Diane Litman
2/10/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We develop models to classify desirable evidence and desirable reasoning revisions in student argumentative writing. We explore two ways to improve classifier performance - using the essay context of the revision, and using the feedback students received before the revision. We perform both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation for each of our models and report a qualitative analysis. Our results show that while a model using feedback information improves over a baseline model, models utilizing context - either alone or with feedback - are the most successful in identifying desirable revisions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{afrin2023predicting,
  title  = {Predicting Desirable Revisions of Evidence and Reasoning in Argumentative Writing},
  author = {Tazin Afrin and Diane Litman},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2302.05039},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05039v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2302.05039.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2302.05039)

Discussion