eRevise+RF: A Writing Evaluation System for Assessing Student Essay Revisions and Providing Formative Feedback

Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang, Tianwen Li, Mason Gobat +2 more
1/1/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: ZhexiongLiu/eRevise-RF-System (2 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-02-26).

Abstract

The ability to revise essays in response to feedback is important for students' writing success. An automated writing evaluation (AWE) system that supports students in revising their essays is thus essential. We present eRevise+RF, an enhanced AWE system for assessing student essay revisions (e.g., changes made to an essay to improve its quality in response to essay feedback) and providing revision feedback. We deployed the system with 6 teachers and 406 students across 3 schools in Pennsylvania and Louisiana. The results confirmed its effectiveness in (1) assessing student essays in terms of evidence usage, (2) extracting evidence and reasoning revisions across essays, and (3) determining revision success in responding to feedback. The evaluation also suggested eRevise+RF is a helpful system for young students to improve their argumentative writing skills through revision and formative feedback.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

A Writing Evaluation System for Assessing Student Essay Revisions and Providing Formative Feedback

20CSS, HTMLDec 8, 20247 months agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2025ereviserf,
  title  = {eRevise+RF: A Writing Evaluation System for Assessing Student Essay Revisions and Providing Formative Feedback},
  author = {Zhexiong Liu and Diane Litman and Elaine Wang and Tianwen Li and Mason Gobat and Lindsay Clare Matsumura and Richard Correnti},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.00715},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00715v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.00715.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.00715)

Discussion