The Challenge of Differentially Private Screening Rules

Amol Khanna, Fred Lu, Edward Raff
3/18/2023
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Linear $L_1$-regularized models have remained one of the simplest and most effective tools in data analysis, especially in information retrieval problems where n-grams over text with TF-IDF or Okapi feature values are a strong and easy baseline. Over the past decade, screening rules have risen in popularity as a way to reduce the runtime for producing the sparse regression weights of $L_1$ models. However, despite the increasing need of privacy-preserving models in information retrieval, to the best of our knoweledge, no differentially private screening rule exists. In this paper, we develop the first differentially private screening rule for linear and logistic regression. In doing so, we discover difficulties in the task of making a useful private screening rule due to the amount of noise added to ensure privacy. We provide theoretical arguments and experimental evidence that this difficulty arises from the screening step itself and not the private optimizer. Based on our results, we highlight that developing an effective private $L_1$ screening method is an open problem in the differential privacy literature.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{khanna2023challenge,
  title  = {The Challenge of Differentially Private Screening Rules},
  author = {Amol Khanna and Fred Lu and Edward Raff},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2303.10303},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10303v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2303.10303.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2303.10303)

Discussion