Better Private Linear Regression Through Better Private Feature Selection

Travis Dick, Jennifer Gillenwater, Matthew Joseph
6/1/2023
cs.LGcs.CR

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 7 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Existing work on differentially private linear regression typically assumes that end users can precisely set data bounds or algorithmic hyperparameters. End users often struggle to meet these requirements without directly examining the data (and violating privacy). Recent work has attempted to develop solutions that shift these burdens from users to algorithms, but they struggle to provide utility as the feature dimension grows. This work extends these algorithms to higher-dimensional problems by introducing a differentially private feature selection method based on Kendall rank correlation. We prove a utility guarantee for the setting where features are normally distributed and conduct experiments across 25 datasets. We find that adding this private feature selection step before regression significantly broadens the applicability of ``plug-and-play'' private linear regression algorithms at little additional cost to privacy, computation, or decision-making by the end user.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 7 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dick2023better,
  title  = {Better Private Linear Regression Through Better Private Feature Selection},
  author = {Travis Dick and Jennifer Gillenwater and Matthew Joseph},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.00920},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00920v1},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.00920.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.00920)

Discussion