Feature Selection from Differentially Private Correlations

Ryan Swope, Amol Khanna, Philip Doldo, Saptarshi Roy, Edward Raff
8/20/2024
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Data scientists often seek to identify the most important features in high-dimensional datasets. This can be done through $L_1$-regularized regression, but this can become inefficient for very high-dimensional datasets. Additionally, high-dimensional regression can leak information about individual datapoints in a dataset. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the established baseline method for feature selection with differential privacy, the two-stage selection technique, and show that it is not stable under sparsity. This makes it perform poorly on real-world datasets, so we consider a different approach to private feature selection. We employ a correlations-based order statistic to choose important features from a dataset and privatize them to ensure that the results do not leak information about individual datapoints. We find that our method significantly outperforms the established baseline for private feature selection on many datasets.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{swope2024feature,
  title  = {Feature Selection from Differentially Private Correlations},
  author = {Ryan Swope and Amol Khanna and Philip Doldo and Saptarshi Roy and Edward Raff},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2408.10862},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10862v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2408.10862.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2408.10862)

Discussion