How to address monotonicity for model risk management?

Dangxing Chen, Weicheng Ye
4/28/2023
cs.LGq-fin.CP

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of establishing the accountability and fairness of transparent machine learning models through monotonicity. Although there have been numerous studies on individual monotonicity, pairwise monotonicity is often overlooked in the existing literature. This paper studies transparent neural networks in the presence of three types of monotonicity: individual monotonicity, weak pairwise monotonicity, and strong pairwise monotonicity. As a means of achieving monotonicity while maintaining transparency, we propose the monotonic groves of neural additive models. As a result of empirical examples, we demonstrate that monotonicity is often violated in practice and that monotonic groves of neural additive models are transparent, accountable, and fair.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2023address,
  title  = {How to address monotonicity for model risk management?},
  author = {Dangxing Chen and Weicheng Ye},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2305.00799},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00799v2},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2305.00799.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2305.00799)

Discussion