Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspective

Ming Li, Chenyi Zhang, Qin Li
1/9/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Monotone learning describes learning processes in which expected performance consistently improves as the amount of training data increases. However, recent studies challenge this conventional wisdom, revealing significant gaps in the understanding of generalization in machine learning. Addressing these gaps is crucial for advancing the theoretical foundations of the field. In this work, we utilize Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning theory to construct a theoretical risk distribution that approximates a learning algorithm's actual performance. We rigorously prove that this theoretical distribution exhibits monotonicity as sample sizes increase. We identify two scenarios under which deterministic algorithms based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) are monotone: (1) the hypothesis space is finite, or (2) the hypothesis space has finite VC-dimension. Experiments on two classical learning problems validate our findings by demonstrating that the monotonicity of the algorithms' generalization error is guaranteed, as its theoretical risk upper bound monotonically converges to 0.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2025monotonic,
  title  = {Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspective},
  author = {Ming Li and Chenyi Zhang and Qin Li},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.05493},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05493v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.05493.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.05493)

Discussion