The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience

Jaan Aru, Matthew Larkum, James M. Shine
6/1/2023
q-bio.NCcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Interactions with large language models have led to the suggestion that these models may soon be conscious. From the perspective of neuroscience, this position is difficult to defend. For one, the inputs to large language models lack the embodied, embedded information content characteristic of our sensory contact with the world around us. Secondly, the architecture of large language models is missing key features of the thalamocortical system that have been linked to conscious awareness in mammals. Finally, the evolutionary and developmental trajectories that led to the emergence of living conscious organisms arguably have no parallels in artificial systems as envisioned today. The existence of living organisms depends on their actions, and their survival is intricately linked to multi-level cellular, inter-cellular, and organismal processes culminating in agency and consciousness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{aru2023feasibility,
  title  = {The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience},
  author = {Jaan Aru and Matthew Larkum and James M. Shine},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.00915},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00915v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.00915.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.00915)

Discussion