Adversarial Attacks on the Interpretation of Neuron Activation Maximization

Geraldin Nanfack, Alexander Fulleringer, Jonathan Marty, Michael Eickenberg, Eugene Belilovsky
6/12/2023
cs.LGcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The internal functional behavior of trained Deep Neural Networks is notoriously difficult to interpret. Activation-maximization approaches are one set of techniques used to interpret and analyze trained deep-learning models. These consist in finding inputs that maximally activate a given neuron or feature map. These inputs can be selected from a data set or obtained by optimization. However, interpretability methods may be subject to being deceived. In this work, we consider the concept of an adversary manipulating a model for the purpose of deceiving the interpretation. We propose an optimization framework for performing this manipulation and demonstrate a number of ways that popular activation-maximization interpretation techniques associated with CNNs can be manipulated to change the interpretations, shedding light on the reliability of these methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nanfack2023adversarial,
  title  = {Adversarial Attacks on the Interpretation of Neuron Activation Maximization},
  author = {Geraldin Nanfack and Alexander Fulleringer and Jonathan Marty and Michael Eickenberg and Eugene Belilovsky},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2306.07397},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07397v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2306.07397.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2306.07397)

Discussion