Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compression

Chirag Pabbaraju
8/12/2023
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

A hypothesis class admits a sample compression scheme, if for every sample labeled by a hypothesis from the class, it is possible to retain only a small subsample, using which the labels on the entire sample can be inferred. The size of the compression scheme is an upper bound on the size of the subsample produced. Every learnable binary hypothesis class (which must necessarily have finite VC dimension) admits a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its VC dimension, independent of the sample size. For multiclass hypothesis classes, the analog of VC dimension is the DS dimension. We show that the analogous statement pertaining to sample compression is not true for multiclass hypothesis classes: every learnable multiclass hypothesis class, which must necessarily have finite DS dimension, does not admit a sample compression scheme of size only a finite function of its DS dimension.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pabbaraju2023multiclass,
  title  = {Multiclass Learnability Does Not Imply Sample Compression},
  author = {Chirag Pabbaraju},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.06424},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06424v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.06424.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.06424)

Discussion