Bayesian uncertainty-weighted loss for improved generalisability on polyp segmentation task

Rebecca S. Stone, Pedro E. Chavarrias-Solano, Andrew J. Bulpitt, David C. Hogg, Sharib Ali
9/13/2023
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

While several previous studies have devised methods for segmentation of polyps, most of these methods are not rigorously assessed on multi-center datasets. Variability due to appearance of polyps from one center to another, difference in endoscopic instrument grades, and acquisition quality result in methods with good performance on in-distribution test data, and poor performance on out-of-distribution or underrepresented samples. Unfair models have serious implications and pose a critical challenge to clinical applications. We adapt an implicit bias mitigation method which leverages Bayesian predictive uncertainties during training to encourage the model to focus on underrepresented sample regions. We demonstrate the potential of this approach to improve generalisability without sacrificing state-of-the-art performance on a challenging multi-center polyp segmentation dataset (PolypGen) with different centers and image modalities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{stone2023bayesian,
  title  = {Bayesian uncertainty-weighted loss for improved generalisability on polyp segmentation task},
  author = {Rebecca S. Stone and Pedro E. Chavarrias-Solano and Andrew J. Bulpitt and David C. Hogg and Sharib Ali},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.06807},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06807v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.06807.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.06807)

Discussion