Comparison of Cross-Entropy, Dice, and Focal Loss for Sea Ice Type Segmentation

Rafael Pires de Lima, Behzad Vahedi, Morteza Karimzadeh
10/26/2023
cs.CVeess.IV

No official code found. Best implementation: geohai/sea-ice-segment (18 stars, last commit 2025-01-06).

Abstract

Up-to-date sea ice charts are crucial for safer navigation in ice-infested waters. Recently, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models show the potential to accelerate the generation of ice maps for large regions. However, results from CNN models still need to undergo scrutiny as higher metrics performance not always translate to adequate outputs. Sea ice type classes are imbalanced, requiring special treatment during training. We evaluate how three different loss functions, some developed for imbalanced class problems, affect the performance of CNN models trained to predict the dominant ice type in Sentinel-1 images. Despite the fact that Dice and Focal loss produce higher metrics, results from cross-entropy seem generally more physically consistent.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Sea ice segmentation using synthetic aperture radar and convolutional neural networks

182PythonDec 6, 20221 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lima2023comparison,
  title  = {Comparison of Cross-Entropy, Dice, and Focal Loss for Sea Ice Type Segmentation},
  author = {Rafael Pires de Lima and Behzad Vahedi and Morteza Karimzadeh},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.17135},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17135v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.17135.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.17135)

Discussion