Principled Penalty-based Methods for Bilevel Reinforcement Learning and RLHF

Han Shen, Zhuoran Yang, Tianyi Chen
2/10/2024
cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Bilevel optimization has been recently applied to many machine learning tasks. However, their applications have been restricted to the supervised learning setting, where static objective functions with benign structures are considered. But bilevel problems such as incentive design, inverse reinforcement learning (RL), and RL from human feedback (RLHF) are often modeled as dynamic objective functions that go beyond the simple static objective structures, which pose significant challenges of using existing bilevel solutions. To tackle this new class of bilevel problems, we introduce the first principled algorithmic framework for solving bilevel RL problems through the lens of penalty formulation. We provide theoretical studies of the problem landscape and its penalty-based (policy) gradient algorithms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms via simulations in the Stackelberg Markov game, RL from human feedback and incentive design.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shen2024principled,
  title  = {Principled Penalty-based Methods for Bilevel Reinforcement Learning and RLHF},
  author = {Han Shen and Zhuoran Yang and Tianyi Chen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.06886},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06886v3},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.06886.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.06886)

Discussion