Sample Complexity Analysis for Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning

Naman Saxena, Vaneet Aggarwal
1/30/2026
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Several important problem settings within the literature of reinforcement learning (RL), such as meta-learning, hierarchical learning, and RL from human feedback (RL-HF), can be modelled as bilevel RL problems. A lot has been achieved in these domains empirically; however, the theoretical analysis of bilevel RL algorithms hasn't received a lot of attention. In this work, we analyse the sample complexity of a constrained bilevel RL algorithm, building on the progress in the unconstrained setting. We obtain an iteration complexity of $O(ε^{-2})$ and sample complexity of $\tilde{O}(ε^{-4})$ for our proposed algorithm, Constrained Bilevel Subgradient Optimization (CBSO). We use a penalty-based objective function to avoid the issue of primal-dual gap and hyper-gradient in the context of a constrained bilevel problem setting. The penalty-based formulation to handle constraints requires analysis of non-smooth optimization. We are the first ones to analyse the generally parameterized policy gradient-based RL algorithm with a non-smooth objective function using the Moreau envelope.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{saxena2026sample,
  title  = {Sample Complexity Analysis for Constrained Bilevel Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Naman Saxena and Vaneet Aggarwal},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2602.00282},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00282v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2602.00282.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2602.00282)

Discussion