A prediction rigidity formalism for low-cost uncertainties in trained neural networks

Filippo Bigi, Sanggyu Chong, Michele Ceriotti, Federico Grasselli
3/4/2024
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Regression methods are fundamental for scientific and technological applications. However, fitted models can be highly unreliable outside of their training domain, and hence the quantification of their uncertainty is crucial in many of their applications. Based on the solution of a constrained optimization problem, we propose "prediction rigidities" as a method to obtain uncertainties of arbitrary pre-trained regressors. We establish a strong connection between our framework and Bayesian inference, and we develop a last-layer approximation that allows the new method to be applied to neural networks. This extension affords cheap uncertainties without any modification to the neural network itself or its training procedure. We show the effectiveness of our method on a wide range of regression tasks, ranging from simple toy models to applications in chemistry and meteorology.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bigi2024prediction,
  title  = {A prediction rigidity formalism for low-cost uncertainties in trained neural networks},
  author = {Filippo Bigi and Sanggyu Chong and Michele Ceriotti and Federico Grasselli},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.02251},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02251v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.02251.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.02251)

Discussion