Representation and Regression Problems in Neural Networks: Relaxation, Generalization, and Numerics

Kang Liu, Enrique Zuazua
12/2/2024
cs.LGmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this work, we address three non-convex optimization problems associated with the training of shallow neural networks (NNs) for exact and approximate representation, as well as for regression tasks. Through a mean-field approach, we convexify these problems and, applying a representer theorem, prove the absence of relaxation gaps. We establish generalization bounds for the resulting NN solutions, assessing their predictive performance on test datasets and, analyzing the impact of key hyperparameters on these bounds, propose optimal choices. On the computational side, we examine the discretization of the convexified problems and derive convergence rates. For low-dimensional datasets, these discretized problems are efficiently solvable using the simplex method. For high-dimensional datasets, we propose a sparsification algorithm that, combined with gradient descent for over-parameterized shallow NNs, yields effective solutions to the primal problems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{liu2024representation,
  title  = {Representation and Regression Problems in Neural Networks: Relaxation, Generalization, and Numerics},
  author = {Kang Liu and Enrique Zuazua},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2412.01619},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01619v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2412.01619.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2412.01619)

Discussion