Limit of the Maximum Random Permutation Set Entropy

Jiefeng Zhou, Zhen Li, Kang Hao Cheong, Yong Deng
3/10/2024
cs.ITcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The Random Permutation Set (RPS) is a new type of set proposed recently, which can be regarded as the generalization of evidence theory. To measure the uncertainty of RPS, the entropy of RPS and its corresponding maximum entropy have been proposed. Exploring the maximum entropy provides a possible way of understanding the physical meaning of RPS. In this paper, a new concept, the envelope of entropy function, is defined. In addition, the limit of the envelope of RPS entropy is derived and proved. Compared with the existing method, the computational complexity of the proposed method to calculate the envelope of RPS entropy decreases greatly. The result shows that when $N \to \infty$, the limit form of the envelope of the entropy of RPS converges to $e \times (N!)^2$, which is highly connected to the constant $e$ and factorial. Finally, numerical examples validate the efficiency and conciseness of the proposed envelope, which provides a new insight into the maximum entropy function.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhou2024limit,
  title  = {Limit of the Maximum Random Permutation Set Entropy},
  author = {Jiefeng Zhou and Zhen Li and Kang Hao Cheong and Yong Deng},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.06206},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06206v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.06206.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.06206)

Discussion