Tighter Confidence Bounds for Sequential Kernel Regression

Hamish Flynn, David Reeb
3/19/2024
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Confidence bounds are an essential tool for rigorously quantifying the uncertainty of predictions. They are a core component in many sequential learning and decision-making algorithms, with tighter confidence bounds giving rise to algorithms with better empirical performance and better performance guarantees. In this work, we use martingale tail inequalities to establish new confidence bounds for sequential kernel regression. Our confidence bounds can be computed by solving a conic program, although this bare version quickly becomes impractical, because the number of variables grows with the sample size. However, we show that the dual of this conic program allows us to efficiently compute tight confidence bounds. We prove that our new confidence bounds are always tighter than existing ones in this setting. We apply our confidence bounds to kernel bandit problems, and we find that when our confidence bounds replace existing ones, the KernelUCB (GP-UCB) algorithm has better empirical performance, a matching worst-case performance guarantee and comparable computational cost.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{flynn2024tighter,
  title  = {Tighter Confidence Bounds for Sequential Kernel Regression},
  author = {Hamish Flynn and David Reeb},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.12732},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12732v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.12732.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.12732)

Discussion