Comparing Explanation Faithfulness between Multilingual and Monolingual Fine-tuned Language Models

Zhixue Zhao, Nikolaos Aletras
3/19/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In many real natural language processing application scenarios, practitioners not only aim to maximize predictive performance but also seek faithful explanations for the model predictions. Rationales and importance distribution given by feature attribution methods (FAs) provide insights into how different parts of the input contribute to a prediction. Previous studies have explored how different factors affect faithfulness, mainly in the context of monolingual English models. On the other hand, the differences in FA faithfulness between multilingual and monolingual models have yet to be explored. Our extensive experiments, covering five languages and five popular FAs, show that FA faithfulness varies between multilingual and monolingual models. We find that the larger the multilingual model, the less faithful the FAs are compared to its counterpart monolingual models.Our further analysis shows that the faithfulness disparity is potentially driven by the differences between model tokenizers. Our code is available: https://github.com/casszhao/multilingual-faith.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhao2024comparing,
  title  = {Comparing Explanation Faithfulness between Multilingual and Monolingual Fine-tuned Language Models},
  author = {Zhixue Zhao and Nikolaos Aletras},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.12809},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12809v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.12809.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.12809)

Discussion