Data Readiness for AI: A 360-Degree Survey

Kaveen Hiniduma, Suren Byna, Jean Luca Bez
4/8/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications critically depend on data. Poor quality data produces inaccurate and ineffective AI models that may lead to incorrect or unsafe use. Evaluation of data readiness is a crucial step in improving the quality and appropriateness of data usage for AI. R&D efforts have been spent on improving data quality. However, standardized metrics for evaluating data readiness for use in AI training are still evolving. In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of metrics used to verify data readiness for AI training. This survey examines more than 140 papers published by ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, journals such as Nature, Springer, and Science Direct, and online articles published by prominent AI experts. This survey aims to propose a taxonomy of data readiness for AI (DRAI) metrics for structured and unstructured datasets. We anticipate that this taxonomy will lead to new standards for DRAI metrics that will be used for enhancing the quality, accuracy, and fairness of AI training and inference.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hiniduma2024data,
  title  = {Data Readiness for AI: A 360-Degree Survey},
  author = {Kaveen Hiniduma and Suren Byna and Jean Luca Bez},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.05779},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05779v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.05779.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.05779)

Discussion