Rethinking Technological Readiness in the Era of AI Uncertainty

S. Tucker Browne, Mark M. Bailey
4/15/2025
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize military combat systems, but ensuring these AI-enabled capabilities are truly mission-ready presents new challenges. We argue that current technology readiness assessments fail to capture critical AI-specific factors, leading to potential risks in deployment. We propose a new AI Readiness Framework to evaluate the maturity and trustworthiness of AI components in military systems. The central thesis is that a tailored framework - analogous to traditional Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) but expanded for AI - can better gauge an AI system's reliability, safety, and suitability for combat use. Using current data evaluation tools and testing practices, we demonstrate the framework's feasibility for near-term implementation. This structured approach provides military decision-makers with clearer insight into whether an AI-enabled system has met the necessary standards of performance, transparency, and human integration to be deployed with confidence, thus advancing the field of defense technology management and risk assessment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{browne2025rethinking,
  title  = {Rethinking Technological Readiness in the Era of AI Uncertainty},
  author = {S. Tucker Browne and Mark M. Bailey},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.11001},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11001v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.11001.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.11001)

Discussion