Generating Robust Counterfactual Witnesses for Graph Neural Networks

Dazhuo Qiu, Mengying Wang, Arijit Khan, Yinghui Wu
4/30/2024
cs.LGcs.DB

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

This paper introduces a new class of explanation structures, called robust counterfactual witnesses (RCWs), to provide robust, both counterfactual and factual explanations for graph neural networks. Given a graph neural network M, a robust counterfactual witness refers to the fraction of a graph G that are counterfactual and factual explanation of the results of M over G, but also remains so for any "disturbed" G by flipping up to k of its node pairs. We establish the hardness results, from tractable results to co-NP-hardness, for verifying and generating robust counterfactual witnesses. We study such structures for GNN-based node classification, and present efficient algorithms to verify and generate RCWs. We also provide a parallel algorithm to verify and generate RCWs for large graphs with scalability guarantees. We experimentally verify our explanation generation process for benchmark datasets, and showcase their applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{qiu2024generating,
  title  = {Generating Robust Counterfactual Witnesses for Graph Neural Networks},
  author = {Dazhuo Qiu and Mengying Wang and Arijit Khan and Yinghui Wu},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.19519},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19519v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.19519.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.19519)

Discussion