Finding Counterfactual Evidences for Node Classification

Dazhuo Qiu, Jinwen Chen, Arijit Khan, Yan Zhao, Francesco Bonchi
5/16/2025
cs.LGcs.DB

No official code found. Best implementation: DazhuoQ/Counterfactual_Evidence (0 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-06-02).

Abstract

Counterfactual learning is emerging as an important paradigm, rooted in causality, which promises to alleviate common issues of graph neural networks (GNNs), such as fairness and interpretability. However, as in many real-world application domains where conducting randomized controlled trials is impractical, one has to rely on available observational (factual) data to detect counterfactuals. In this paper, we introduce and tackle the problem of searching for counterfactual evidences for the GNN-based node classification task. A counterfactual evidence is a pair of nodes such that, regardless they exhibit great similarity both in the features and in their neighborhood subgraph structures, they are classified differently by the GNN. We develop effective and efficient search algorithms and a novel indexing solution that leverages both node features and structural information to identify counterfactual evidences, and generalizes beyond any specific GNN. Through various downstream applications, we demonstrate the potential of counterfactual evidences to enhance fairness and accuracy of GNNs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

KDD 2025: Finding Counterfactual Evidences for Node Classification

00Shell, PythonFeb 9, 20251 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{qiu2025finding,
  title  = {Finding Counterfactual Evidences for Node Classification},
  author = {Dazhuo Qiu and Jinwen Chen and Arijit Khan and Yan Zhao and Francesco Bonchi},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.11396},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11396v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.11396.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.11396)

Discussion