Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approaches

Thorsten Pröhl, Erik Putzier, Rüdiger Zarnekow
6/17/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the field of LLM text recognition. Different approaches and implemented detectors for the recognition of LLM-generated text are presented. In addition to discussing the implementations, the article focuses on benchmarking the detectors. Although there are numerous software products for the recognition of LLM-generated text, with a focus on ChatGPT-like LLMs, the quality of the recognition (recognition rate) is not clear. Furthermore, while it can be seen that scientific contributions presenting their novel approaches strive for some kind of comparison with other approaches, the construction and independence of the evaluation dataset is often not comprehensible. As a result, discrepancies in the performance evaluation of LLM detectors are often visible due to the different benchmarking datasets. This article describes the creation of an evaluation dataset and uses this dataset to investigate the different detectors. The selected detectors are benchmarked against each other.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{prhl2024benchmarking,
  title  = {Benchmarking of LLM Detection: Comparing Two Competing Approaches},
  author = {Thorsten Pröhl and Erik Putzier and Rüdiger Zarnekow},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.11670},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11670v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.11670.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.11670)

Discussion