Evaluation of Instruction-Following Ability for Large Language Models on Story-Ending Generation

Rem Hida, Junki Ohmura, Toshiyuki Sekiya
6/24/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across various benchmark tasks. While providing instructions to LLMs for guiding their generations is user-friendly, assessing their instruction-following capabilities is still unclarified due to a lack of evaluation metrics. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the instruction-following ability of LLMs in the context of story-ending generation, which requires diverse and context-specific instructions. We propose an automatic evaluation pipeline that utilizes a machine reading comprehension (MRC) model to determine whether the generated story-ending reflects instruction. Our findings demonstrate that our proposed metric aligns with human evaluation. Furthermore, our experiments confirm that recent open-source LLMs can achieve instruction-following performance close to GPT-3.5, as assessed through automatic evaluation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hida2024evaluation,
  title  = {Evaluation of Instruction-Following Ability for Large Language Models on Story-Ending Generation},
  author = {Rem Hida and Junki Ohmura and Toshiyuki Sekiya},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2406.16356},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16356v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2406.16356.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2406.16356)

Discussion