A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations

Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan +8 more
7/4/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: ntunlp/Critical-Review-of-LLM-Eval (3 stars, last commit 2025-01-06).

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently gained significant attention due to their remarkable capabilities in performing diverse tasks across various domains. However, a thorough evaluation of these models is crucial before deploying them in real-world applications to ensure they produce reliable performance. Despite the well-established importance of evaluating LLMs in the community, the complexity of the evaluation process has led to varied evaluation setups, causing inconsistencies in findings and interpretations. To address this, we systematically review the primary challenges and limitations causing these inconsistencies and unreliable evaluations in various steps of LLM evaluation. Based on our critical review, we present our perspectives and recommendations to ensure LLM evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

EMNLP 2024 Survey Paper on LLM Evaluation

31PythonOct 1, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{laskar2024systematic,
  title  = {A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations},
  author = {Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar and Sawsan Alqahtani and M Saiful Bari and Mizanur Rahman and Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan and Haidar Khan and Israt Jahan and Amran Bhuiyan and Chee Wei Tan and Md Rizwan Parvez and Enamul Hoque and Shafiq Joty and Jimmy Huang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2407.04069},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04069v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2407.04069.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2407.04069)

Discussion