Evaluating the Process Modeling Abilities of Large Language Models -- Preliminary Foundations and Results

Peter Fettke, Constantin Houy
3/14/2025
cs.CLcs.LGcs.SE

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLM) have revolutionized the processing of natural language. Although first benchmarks of the process modeling abilities of LLM are promising, it is currently under debate to what extent an LLM can generate good process models. In this contribution, we argue that the evaluation of the process modeling abilities of LLM is far from being trivial. Hence, available evaluation results must be taken carefully. For example, even in a simple scenario, not only the quality of a model should be taken into account, but also the costs and time needed for generation. Thus, an LLM does not generate one optimal solution, but a set of Pareto-optimal variants. Moreover, there are several further challenges which have to be taken into account, e.g. conceptualization of quality, validation of results, generalizability, and data leakage. We discuss these challenges in detail and discuss future experiments to tackle these challenges scientifically.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{fettke2025evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating the Process Modeling Abilities of Large Language Models -- Preliminary Foundations and Results},
  author = {Peter Fettke and Constantin Houy},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.13520},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13520v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.13520.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.13520)

Discussion