Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHF

Nicolai Dorka
9/16/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

Official code: Nicolinho/QRM (3 stars, last commit 2024-09-17).

Abstract

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has become a key method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences through the use of reward models. However, traditional reward models typically generate point estimates, which oversimplify the diversity and complexity of human values and preferences. In this paper, we introduce Quantile Reward Models (QRMs), a novel approach to reward modeling that learns a distribution over rewards instead of a single scalar value. Our method uses quantile regression to estimate a full, potentially multimodal distribution over preferences, providing a more powerful and nuanced representation of preferences. This distributional approach can better capture the diversity of human values, addresses label noise, and accommodates conflicting preferences by modeling them as distinct modes in the distribution. Our experimental results show that QRM outperforms comparable traditional point-estimate models on RewardBench. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the additional information provided by the distributional estimates can be utilized in downstream applications, such as risk-aware reinforcement learning, resulting in LLM policies that generate fewer extremely negative responses. Our code and model are released at https://github.com/Nicolinho/QRM.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Nicolinho/QRMOfficial100%
30Sep 15, 20242 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{dorka2024quantile,
  title  = {Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHF},
  author = {Nicolai Dorka},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2409.10164},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10164v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2409.10164.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2409.10164)

Discussion